escalating violence in our community Become a member of the Sensible Sentencing Trust

Mouseover links for full page descriptions

Offender Databases Graham Dawson

Graham Leslie Dawson

Alias

.

Offences

Six charges of indecent assault on Rotorua boys ages 6 to 16 over a 30 year time period from the mid 1970's
Prior convictions for indecent assault on a boy in 1984, a further two indecent assaults on two 12 year old boys in 1986, and agin on another boy under 12 in 1990.
Following the above convictions he plead guilty to a further 12 indecent assault charges relating to four Rotorua boys aged 8-12

Victims

.

Offender Affiliations

.

Gang affiliations

none known

Age

Born 1949

Current Location

unknown

Parole/Release Dates

Sentenced to seven years in April 2000
Sentenced to a further two years cumulatively in June 2000
Preventive detention was considered

Background
From the Sunday Star Times, April 16 2000
"A Tauranga fisherman has been sentenced to seven years' jail for sexual attacks on young boys spanning more than 30 years. Graham Leslie Dawson, 51, appeared for sentencing in the Rotorua High Court on six charges of indecently assaulting boys aged from six to 16."
Further information on this offender would be gratefully recieved!

---

Corrections and Additional Information
We endeavour to make this database as accurate as possible, but we are at the mercy of whatever information we can find in various online and offline archives. We rely on the public - that is, people like you - to fill in the gaps that we cannot. If you wish to submit additional information or a correction to this file CLICK HERE . Privacy: Trust policy is that all sources are treated as strictly confidential unless we are explicitly told otherwise. If you wish to see a file removed from this database certain conditions must be met by the offender set out HERE Note that this does NOT apply for those that are the primary offender in a murder, rape, or any sexual offending involving minors. We do not enter into correspondence regarding the guilt/innocence of offenders. Such correspondence is not responded to, especially if the offender concerned has a number of prior convictions

Back to Top