escalating violence in our community Become a member of the Sensible Sentencing Trust

Mouseover links for full page descriptions

Offender Databases Warren Harding

Warren Bradley David Harding

Alias

.

Offences

Convicted of possessing child pornography in June 2008 including images of children as young as 7 years old
Prior convictions for possessing objectionable material involving child sexual abuse, bestiality and extreme cruelty

Victims

.

Offender Affiliations

.

Gang affiliations

none known

Age

Born 1940

Current Location

At large

Parole/Release Dates

Sentenced to two years in June 2008

Background
NZ Herald story here
News report from 5th Jun 2008
The Department of Internal Affairs says a two year prison sentence for a man convicted of possessing child pornography should send a warning to others.

Warren Bradley David Harding, 68, was jailed after being denied home detention at the Hamilton District Court. Inspectors seized nearly 23,000 computer files at Harding's home; they contained adult pornography and sexually explicit pictures of girls as young as seven.

The Department's deputy secretary Keith Manch says the sentence sends a strong message that courts are taking such offences seriously. He says people who possess child pornography contribute to the abuse of children.

---

Corrections and Additional Information
We endeavour to make this database as accurate as possible, but we are at the mercy of whatever information we can find in various online and offline archives. We rely on the public - that is, people like you - to fill in the gaps that we cannot. If you wish to submit additional information or a correction to this file CLICK HERE . Privacy: Trust policy is that all sources are treated as strictly confidential unless we are explicitly told otherwise. If you wish to see a file removed from this database certain conditions must be met by the offender set out HERE Note that this does NOT apply for those that are the primary offender in a murder, rape, or any sexual offending involving minors. We do not enter into correspondence regarding the guilt/innocence of offenders. Such correspondence is not responded to, especially if the offender concerned has a number of prior convictions

Back to Top